/inference/segmind-tiny-sd

segmind/tiny-sd

Measured by one node on hardware we do not own, and signed by each of them. What machines here actually proved — never what the card claims.

matrix built 12 Sept 2026 · every field verified against the signature of the node that produced it, and re-verifiable by you: each signed figure carries the exact bytes the node signed (signing_payload_b64) and the signature over them, and the ed25519 public key is embedded in node_did. effective_ctx is the context length a node PROVED by recall, never the length a model card advertises

context declarednot declaredwhat the runtime reported. A node attests it was told this; nobody attests it is true.

context proved by recallnot probedthe largest size at which a machine could still find tokens planted across the whole prompt — start, middle and end, all of which had to come back.

Both numbers are needed to state a gap, and one of them is missing.

what it produced, measured

image generation

resolution512×512took27sspeed0.06 steps/sec

measured on Windows, 8 cores, 16 GB · steps_per_second 0.05882773049864627

The fastest measurement any machine reported, signed by the machine that took it. Every other machine’s numbers are in the table below — a rate is a fact about a model and a computer, and two machines disagreeing is two hardware classes rather than one of them being wrong.

Capabilities, measured

Generates imagespassed

The engine turned text into a decodable image with real content — checked for a valid container, sane dimensions, and that it is not a single flat colour, which is what a failed render usually returns. It deliberately does NOT claim the picture matches the prompt: judging that needs a second model, and a judge’s bias would become this network’s signed opinion.

signed by this network

What machines here proved

best throughput0.06 steps/sec

machines that measured it1

regions it was proved in1

Every line traces to a node signature.

from the public record · unsigned

What the runtime says about it

No runtime metadata was attested for this model.The only unsigned block on this page. We attest we read these from the runtime — not that they are true. Nobody signs a model card.

attempted, and rejected

probe · did:epn:002408…2e5c02: signature invalid

A rejected result is not hidden — it is the network saying a claim did not check out.

Proven across regions

Bengaluru, Karnataka562130 · 1 node

The machine that measured it

nothing is averaged — the machine is what you are choosing

did:epn:002408…9e3c79Bengaluru · 562130 · 5 Sept 2026

—ctx provedprobe qfrKIUiBlO…

—tok/s

✓ Generates images

Run this where your data already is

Tell us the workload, whose machines it should run on, and which jurisdiction it answers to.

Run a gramPut a machine on the network in this region; it signs its capacity into the room.Open a gramxStart your own room — an org, a community, a brand.Be invitedAccept a link from an admin to cross into the private room.